书城政治超越均势:冷战后的美国南亚安全战略
13100800000049

第49章 结语(5)

[14]如1997年的“孟印缅斯泰经济合作”(BIMST‐EC)和2000年的“恒河—湄公河项目”(Ganga‐MekongProject)。

[15]Venu Rajamony,“India‐China‐U.S.Triangle:A‘Soft’Balance of Power System in the Making”,CSIS Working Report,March 2002,p.3.

[16]U.S.Department of Defense,Indo‐U.S.Military Relationship:Expectations andPerceptions,2003.

[17]2003年11月12—13日,印度三军协会举行了题为“The Emergence of People's Republic of China asa Power to Reckon with in the International Arena and the Implication for India and the Region”的国家安全年会,许多军方高级人士表示了对中国崛起的担忧和与美国发展紧密安全合作的愿望,见United Service Institution of India,US National Security Series 2003,New Delhi:Knowledge World,2004.

[18]不用说,美国学者比他们的中国和印度同行对中美印战略三角进行了更多的研究。美国学者对此的研究主要有:Venu Rajamony,“India‐China‐U.S.Triangle:A‘Soft’Balance of Power System in the Making”,in CSIS Occasional Report(March 2002),http://www.csis.org/saprog/venu.pdf;John W.Garver,“The China‐India‐U.S.Triangle:Strategic Relations in the post‐Cold War Era”,in NBA analysis,Vol.13,No.5(October 2002);Mohan Malik,‘US‐India‐China:A Tangled Triangle’,in Force(India),September 2003;and Harry Harding,“The Evolution of the StrategicTriangle:China,India,and the United States”,in Frankel,Francine R.and Harry Harding,eds.,The India‐China Relationship:What the United States Needs to K now,New York:Columbia University Press,2004.

[19]Venu Rajamony,“India‐China‐U.S.Triangle:A‘Soft’Balance of Power System in the Making”,CSIS Working Report,March 2002,p.8.

[20]马加力:《关注印度———崛起中的大国》,天津人民出版社2002年版,第222页。

[21]美国方面关于中印关系的分析,可参阅John W.Garver,Protracted Contest:Sino‐Indian Rivalry in the Twentieth Century,Seattle:University of Washington Press,2001;and Francine R.Frankel and Harry Harding,eds.,The India‐China Relationship:W hat the United States Needs to K now,New York:Columbia University Press,2004.印度方面关于中印关系历史回顾的最新著作是B.R.Deepak,India&;China 1904—2004:A Century of Peace and Conflict,New Delhi:Manak Publications Pvt.Ltd.2005.

[22]Harry Harding,“The Evolution of the Strategic Triangle:China,India,and the United States”,in Francine R.Frankel and Harry Harding,eds.,The India‐China Relationship:Rivalry and Engagement,New Delhi:Oxford University Press India,2004,p.326.

[23]See Dennis Kux,The United States and Pakistan 1947—2000:Disenchanted Allies,Washington,D.C.and Baltimore:Woodrow Wilson Center Press and The Johns Hopkins University Press,2000,p.135.并且,“自1947年以来,美国已向印度提供了1.57亿美元的军事援助,90%以上在1962—1966年之间”,见K Alan Kronstadt,“India‐U.S.Relations”,CRS(Congressional Research Service)Issue Brief for Congress,updated 4 November 2004.

[24]John W.Garver,“The China‐India‐U.S.Triangle:Strategic Relations in the post‐Cold War Era”,in NBA analysis,Vol.13,No.5(October 2002),pp.11-16.

[25]Susan L.Shirk,“One‐Sided Rivalry:China's Perceptions and Policies toward India”,in Frankeland Harding,eds.,The India‐China Relationshi p,p.84.

[26]Garver,“The China‐India‐U.S.T rian gle”,p.41.

[27]关于美国学者对中美关系历史的回顾,见Harry Harding,A Fragile Relationship:The United States and China since 1972,Washington,D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,1992;and David M.Lampton,Same Bed,Different Dreams,Stanford:Stanford University Press,2001.

[28]Stephen P.Cohen,India:Emerging Power,New Delhi:Oxford University Press India,2002,“preface”,p.x.

[29]Frankel and Harding,eds.,the India‐China Relationship,p.324.

[30]Ibid.p.337.

[31]Venu Rajamony,“India‐China‐U.S.Triangle:A‘Soft’Balance of Power System in the Making”,CSIS Working Report,March 2002,p.37.

[32]哈里·哈丁的这一说法是在基辛格一个比喻的基础上的修改。基辛格曾说,美国可以“既喝伏特加又饮茅台酒”,以说明美国在中美苏三角中的有利地位。见Frankel and Harding eds.,The India‐China Relationshi p,p.322 and 349.

[33]Rajat Pandit,“India to‘Arm’Itself for Strategic Interests”,The Times of India,27 October 2004.

[34]倪世雄、王义桅:“霸权均势:冷战后美国的战略选择”,《美国研究》2000年第1期,第22页。

[35]夏立平:“当代国际关系中的三角关系:超越均势理念”,《世界经济与政治》2002年第1期,第20页。