It is the mark of what we call a righteous decision,that it is made directly and for its own sake.The whole man,mind and body,having come to an agreement,tyrannically dictates conduct.There are two dispositions eternally opposed:that in which we recognise that one thing is wrong and another right,and that in which,not seeing any clear distinction,we fall back on the consideration of consequences.The truth is,by the scope of our present teaching,nothing is thought very wrong and nothing very right,except a few actions which have the disadvantage of being disrespectable when found out;the more serious part of men inclining to think all things RATHER WRONG,the more jovial to suppose them RIGHT ENOUGHFOR PRACTICAL PURPOSES.I will engage my head,they do not find that view in their own hearts;they have taken it up in a dark despair;they are but troubled sleepers talking in their sleep.The soul,or my soul at least,thinks very distinctly upon many points of right and wrong,and often differs flatly with what is held out as the thought of corporate humanity in the code of society or the code of law.
Am I to suppose myself a monster?I have only to read books,the Christian Gospels for example,to think myself a monster no longer;and instead I think the mass of people are merely speaking in their sleep.
It is a commonplace,enshrined,if I mistake not,even in school copy-books,that honour is to be sought and not fame.
I ask no other admission;we are to seek honour,upright walking with our own conscience every hour of the day,and not fame,the consequence,the far-off reverberation of our footsteps.The walk,not the rumour of the walk,is what concerns righteousness.Better disrespectable honour than dishonourable fame.Better useless or seemingly hurtful honour,than dishonour ruling empires and filling the mouths of thousands.For the man must walk by what he sees,and leave the issue with God who made him and taught him by the fortune of his life.You would not dishonour yourself for money;which is at least tangible;would you do it,then,for a doubtful forecast in politics,or another person's theory in morals?
So intricate is the scheme of our affairs,that no man can calculate the bearing of his own behaviour even on those immediately around him,how much less upon the world at large or on succeeding generations!To walk by external prudence and the rule of consequences would require,not a man,but God.All that we know to guide us in this changing labyrinth is our soul with its fixed design of righteousness,and a few old precepts which commend themselves to that.The precepts are vague when we endeavour to apply them;consequences are more entangled than a wisp of string,and their confusion is unrestingly in change;we must hold to what we know and walk by it.We must walk by faith,indeed,and not by knowledge.
You do not love another because he is wealthy or wise or eminently respectable:you love him because you love him;that is love,and any other only a derision and grimace.It should be the same with all our actions.If we were to conceive a perfect man,it should be one who was never torn between conflicting impulses,but who,on the absolute consent of all his parts and faculties,submitted in every action of his life to a self-dictation as absolute and unreasoned as that which bids him love one woman and be true to her till death.But we should not conceive him as sagacious,ascetical,playing off his appetites against each other,turning the wing of public respectable immorality instead of riding it directly down,or advancing toward his end through a thousand sinister compromises and considerations.The one man might be wily,might be adroit,might be wise,might be respectable,might be gloriously useful;it is the other man who would be good.
The soul asks honour and not fame;to be upright,not to be successful;to be good,not prosperous;to be essentially,not outwardly,respectable.Does your soul ask profit?Does it ask money?Does it ask the approval of the indifferent herd?I believe not.For my own part,I want but little money,I hope;and I do not want to be decent at all,but to be good.
IV
WE have spoken of that supreme self-dictation which keeps varying from hour to hour in its dictates with the variation of events and circumstances.Now,for us,that is ultimate.
It may be founded on some reasonable process,but it is not a process which we can follow or comprehend.And moreover the dictation is not continuous,or not continuous except in very lively and well-living natures;and between-whiles we must brush along without it.Practice is a more intricate and desperate business than the toughest theorising;life is an affair of cavalry,where rapid judgment and prompt action are alone possible and right.As a matter of fact,there is no one so upright but he is influenced by the world's chatter;and no one so headlong but he requires to consider consequences and to keep an eye on profit.For the soul adopts all affections and appetites without exception,and cares only to combine them for some common purpose which shall interest all.Now,respect for the opinion of others,the study of consequences,and the desire of power and comfort,are all undeniably factors in the nature of man;and the more undeniably since we find that,in our current doctrines,they have swallowed up the others and are thought to conclude in themselves all the worthy parts of man.
These,then,must also be suffered to affect conduct in the practical domain,much or little according as they are forcibly or feebly present to the mind of each.